> Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2010/11/21 Humair Mohammed : > >>> shared_buffers = 2 > >> shared_buffers = 2 ??? > > Yeah, if that's not a typo, that's a very serious misconfiguration.
I guess that's a typo, as the explain plain in one of the previous posts contains Buffers: shared hit=192 read=4833 for a sequential scan. But I still don't know why is the query so slow :-( regards Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
