Here is my new pgbench's point pgbench -h 127.0.0.1 -p 9999 -U postgres -c 200 -t 100 -s 10 pgbench
Scale option ignored, using pgbench_branches table count = 10 starting vacuum...end. transaction type: TPC-B (sort of) scaling factor: 10 query mode: simple number of clients: 200 number of threads: 1 number of transactions per client: 100 number of transactions actually processed: 20000/20000 tps = 202.556936 (including connections establishing) tps = 225.498811 (excluding connections establishing) PostgreSQL config with pgtune default_statistics_target = 100 # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 maintenance_work_mem = 480MB # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 constraint_exclusion = on # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9 # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 effective_cache_size = 2816MB # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 work_mem = 8MB # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 wal_buffers = 32MB # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 checkpoint_segments = 64 # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 shared_buffers = 960MB # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 max_connections = 254 # pgtune wizard 2010-12-15 I have server computer install Windows 2008R2, PostgreSQL 9.0.1 64 bit, 8G RAM, RAID 10 - 4 disks Is it common pgbench 's point with my server ? Thanks you very much. Tuan Hoang Anh On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Ivan Voras <ivo...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 12/18/10 20:42, tuanhoanganh wrote: > >> Here is my result without -C >> pgbench -h 127.0.0.1 -p 9999 -U postgres -c 100 -t 10 -s 10 pgbench >> > > You really should replace "-t 10" with something like "-T 60" or more. > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance >
