On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Madhu Ramachandran <iamma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > i was looking at
> > http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node96.html
> > when they talk about using OID type to store large blobs (in my case .jpg
> > files )
>
> It's probably worth noting that that document is 9 years old.  It
> might be worth reading something a little more up-to-date.  Perhaps:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/largeobjects.html
>
>
A bit late to respond but better than never!

As of my latest testing in 8.3, I've found that the lo_* functions while
adequate are a bit slow.  Our implemented alternative that leverages
pg_read_file() is significantly faster.  I believe it is because
pg_read_file() tells the database to go straight to the file system rather
than through the client connection.  From memory, I seem to recall this
being about 20% faster than the lo_* option or simple INSERTs.

The downside to pg_read_file() is that the file must be 1) on the same
system as the database and 2) must be under the $PGDATA directory.  We opted
to create a directory $PGDATA/public with proper system-side permissions but
open enough to allow the database owner to read the files.

For example,
postgres=# select pg_read_file('public/a_file', 0,
(pg_stat_file('postgresql.conf')).size);

We use this method in conjunction with additional checks to store files in
tables governed by the MD5 hash of the file to prevent duplication.

HTH.
Greg

Reply via email to