Not for user data, only controller data.
---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:11:10 -0700 (PDT) >From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org (on behalf of Andy ><angelf...@yahoo.com>) >Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Intel SSDs that may not suck >To: Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com>,Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> >Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>,Greg >Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> > > >--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> wrote: > > >> I could care less about the 'fast' sandforce drives. >> They fail at a high >> rate and the performance improvement is BECAUSE they are >> using a large, >> volatile write cache. > >The G1 and G2 Intel MLC also use volatile write cache, just like most >SandForce drives do. > >-- >Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) >To make changes to your subscription: >http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
