On 09/05/2011 02:48 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 3 Září 2011, 9:26, Gerhard Wohlgenannt wrote:
Dear list,
we are encountering serious performance problems with our database.
Queries which took around 100ms or less last week now take several
seconds.
Results of Bonnie++
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
voyager 95G 1400 93 27804 3 16324 2 2925 96 41636 3
374.9 4
Latency 7576us 233s 164s 15647us 13120ms
3302ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
voyager -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 141 0 +++++ +++ 146 0 157 0 +++++ +++
172 0
Latency 1020ms 128us 9148ms 598ms 37us
485ms
That seems a bit slow ... 27MB/s for writes and 41MB/s forreads is ait
slow with 8 drives.
Tomas
Agreed, that's really slow. A single SATA drive will get 60 MB/s. Did you run
Bonnie while the VM's were up and running?
root@host:~# vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 0 308024 884812 40512932 0 0 464 168 353 92 4 2 84
9
Only one line? That does not help much. Can you run it as 'vmstat 2' and let
it run while a few slow queries are performed? Then paste all the lines?
-Andy
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
