On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Igor, > > * Igor Chudov (ichu...@gmail.com) wrote: >> Would the time that it takes, differ a great deal, depending on whether the >> table has only 100,000 or 5,000,000 records? > > Yes, because PostgreSQL is going to copy the data. If you don't need or > want it to be copied, just use a view. I've never heard of any > relational database implementing 'copy on write' type semantics, if > that's what you're asking about. Databases, unlike applications with > code in memory that's constantly copied, are typically focused around > minimizing duplication of data (since it all has to end up on disk at > some point). Not much point in having the overhead of COW for that kind > of environment, I wouldn't think.
Isn't the WAL basically COW? -- Jon -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
