Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Robert Schnabel (schnab...@missouri.edu) wrote:
> > And getting back to the to-do list entry and reading the related
> > posts, it appears that even if you could set work_mem that high it
> > would only use 2GB anyway.  I guess that was the second part of my
> > question.  Is that true?
> 
> Errr, and to get back to the to-do (which I've been considering doing
> something about...), it's to allow the *actual* memory usage for things
> like sorts to use more than 2GB, but as others have pointed out, you can
> do that by putting pgsql_tmp on a memory filesystem and letting the
> sorts spill to the memory-based FS.

It would be nice if the tempfs would allow us to control total temp
memory usage, except it causes a failure rather than splilling to real
disk.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to