On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Ernesto Quiñones <ernes...@gmail.com> wrote: >> vacuum_cost_delay 1s >> vacuum_cost_limit 200 > > Those are insane settings for vacuum costing, even on a very slow > machine. Basically you're starving vacuum and autovacuum so much that > they can never keep up.
sorry, the word I meant there was pathological. No insult intended. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
