Hello,
Due to a large database size, my weekend database backup (pg_dumpall) takes 
about 12 hours to complete. Additionally, I add the --no-unlogged-table-data 
option to skip any volatile tables. One UNLOGGED table in the database is 
completely regenerated every day with a TRUNCATE TABLE/INSERT command. However, 
despite the --no-unlogged-table-data option, the table still gets locked by the 
pg_dump(all), preventing the operation from completing for several hours during 
backups.

To the extent possible, I would like to request a way to prevent certain 
(UNLOGGED) tables from being locked against truncate/schema changes for the 
extent of an entire database backup.

For example:
. pg_dump does not lock unlogged tables if --no-unlogged-table-data is set 
. pg_dump supports sequential table locks / unlocks during backups (only the 
table that is currently being copied is locked, rather than all tables for the 
entire backup).
. Support a way to automatically replace the TRUNCATE command with DELETE if 
TRUNCATE cannot immediately obtain a lock.

Thanks, Robert

Robert McGehee, CFA
Geode Capital Management, LLC
One Post Office Square, 28th Floor | Boston, MA | 02109
Direct: (617)392-8396

This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, are intended for use by the 
addressee(s) only and may contain information that is (i) confidential 
information of Geode Capital Management, LLC and/or its affiliates, and/or (ii) 
proprietary information of Geode Capital Management, LLC and/or its affiliates. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or if you have otherwise 
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by telephone (you 
may call collect), or by e-mail, and please permanently delete the original, 
any print outs and any copies of the foregoing. Any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. 


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to