Richard Kojedzinszky <kri...@tvnetwork.hu> wrote:
 
> tuning our installation to not to use sequence scans in this case?
 
Make sure effective_cache_size is set to the sum of shared_buffers
and whatever your OS shows as usable for caching.  Try adjusting
cost factors: maybe random_page_cost between 1 and 2, and
cpu_tuple_cost between 0.03 and 0.05.
 
-Kevin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to