Glad to hear postgresql becomes better and better :)

2012/6/18 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> =?KOI8-U?B?96bUwcymyiD0yc3eydvJzg==?= <tiv...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Today I've found a query that I thought will be fast turned out to be
> slow.
> > The problem is correlated exists with join - it does not want to make
> > correlated nested loop to make exists check.
>
> 9.2 will make this all better.  These are exactly the type of case where
> you need the "parameterized path" stuff.
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

-- 
Best regards,
 Vitalii Tymchyshyn

Reply via email to