On 24/07/2012 15:30, Craig James wrote:


On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos <ioan...@anatec.com <mailto:ioan...@anatec.com>> wrote:

    Hello,
    The Postres 9.0 database we use gets about 20K inserts per minute.
    As long as you don't query at the same time the database is
    copying fine. However long running queries seems to delay so much
    the db that the application server buffers the incoming data as it
    cannot insert them fast enough. The server has 4 HD. One is used
    for archive, past static tables, the second is the index of the
    current live tables and the third is the current data. The fourth
    is the OS.

    The serve specs are:
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           W3520  @ 2.67GHz
    4 cores
    18GB Ram

    Do you think that this work load is high that requires an upgrade
    to cluster or RAID 10 to cope with it?


You need to learn more about what exactly is your bottleneck ... memory, CPU, or I/O. That said, I suspect you'd be way better off with this hardware if you built a single software RAID 10 array and put everything on it.

Right now, the backup disk and the OS disk are sitting idle most of the time. With a RAID10 array, you'd at least double, maybe quadruple your I/O. And if you added a battery-backed RAID controller, you'd have a pretty fast system.

Craig


    Kind Regards
    Yiannis

-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
    (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
    <mailto:pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>)
    To make changes to your subscription:
    http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


I can only assume that it is an i/o issue. At last this is what I can read from iostat:


Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 277.50 0.00 20.00 0.00 2344.00 117.20 0.09 2.25 4.50 9.00 sdb 1.00 0.50 207.50 4.50 45228.00 33.50 213.50 2.40 11.34 4.13 87.50 sdc 0.00 0.00 29.50 0.00 4916.00 0.00 166.64 0.11 3.73 1.36 4.00 sdd 0.00 0.00 4.00 179.50 96.00 3010.00 16.93 141.25 828.77 5.45 100.00

avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
           7.60    0.00    2.08   46.45    0.00   43.87

Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 61.50 0.00 28.00 0.00 704.00 25.14 0.04 3.04 1.43 4.00 sdb 2.00 0.00 90.50 162.00 19560.00 2992.00 89.31 78.92 194.26 3.76 95.00 sdc 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 2160.00 0.00 205.71 0.02 1.90 1.90 2.00 sdd 0.00 0.00 1.50 318.50 24.00 5347.00 16.78 134.72 572.81 3.12 100.00

Where sdb is the data disk and sdd is the index disk. "Top" hardly reports anything more than 10% per postgress process ever, while when the query is running, these numbers on iostat are consistatnly high. At least I can identify my buffering the moment that index hits 100% util. Is there any other way that I can identify bottlenecks in a more positive way?

Reply via email to