On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:23 PM, John Lister <john.lis...@kickstone.com> wrote:
> Cheers, I'll give it a go, I wonder if this is likely to be integrated into
> the main code? As has been mentioned here before, postgresql isn't as badly
> affected as mysql for example, but I'm wondering if the trend to larger
> memory and more cores/nodes means it should be offered as an option?
> Although saying that I've read that 10Gb of shared buffers may be enough
> even in big machines 128+Gb ram..
>
> Thoughts?

The attached (better) patch builds and doesn't crash at least.
Which is always good.

Configure with --with-numa

Attachment: numa.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to