> What I can not understand is why the seq scan's estimated cost is
> better the index scan's one. It depends on the number of pages in
> index/relation. May be the index is heavily bloated?
Mm i don't know how to see bloating level. But the index was created by
create index on hashcheck using btree (name)
after the table population.
Sizes:
hashes=# select pg_total_relation_size('hashcheck');
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
2067701760
(1 row)
hashes=# select pg_total_relation_size('hashcheck_name_rev_idx');
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
629170176
(1 row)
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
