Le 2013-01-07 à 16:49, james a écrit :
Is there a way to force a WAL flush so that async commits (from other
connections) are flushed, short of actually updating a sacrificial row?
Would be nice to do it without generating anything extra, even if it is
something that causes IO in the checkpoint.
Am I right to think that an empty transaction won't do it, and nor will a
transaction that is just a NOTIFY?
Does pg_start_backup() trigger a full WAL flush?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-LOWLEVEL-BASE-BACKUP
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-ADMIN-BACKUP-TABLE
Bye,
François
That sounds rather heavyweight!
I'm looking for something lightweight - I might call this rather often,
as a sort of application-level group commit where I commit async but
defer the ack to the requester (or other externally visible side
effects) slightly until some other thread forces a flush.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
