I've benchmarked shared_buffers with high and low settings, in a server 
dedicated to postgres with 48GB my settings are: 
shared_buffers = 37GB 
effective_cache_size = 38GB

Having a small number and depending on OS caching is unpredictable, if the 
server is dedicated to postgres you want make sure postgres has the memory. A 
random unrelated process doing a cat /dev/sda1 should not destroy postgres 
buffers.
I agree your problem is most related to dirty background ration, where buffers 
are READ only and have nothing to do with disk writes.


From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:06:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] postgresql.conf recommendations
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]

As others suggested having shared_buffers = 48GB is to large. You should never 
need to go above 8GB. I have a similar server and mine has 

shared_buffers = 8GB


checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9

This looks like a problem of dirty memory being flushed to the disk. You should 
set your monitoring to monitor dirty memory from /proc/meminfo and check if it 
has any correlation with the slowdowns. Also vm.dirty_background_bytes should 
always be a fraction of  vm.dirty_bytes, since when there is more than 
vm.dirty_bytes bytes dirty it will stop all writing to the disk until it 
flushes everything, while when it reaches the vm.dirty_background_bytes it will 
slowly start flushing those pages to the disk. As far as I remember 
vm.dirty_bytes should be configured to be a little less than the cache size of 
your RAID controller, while vm.dirty_background_bytes should be 4 times smaller.




Strahinja Kustudić | System Engineer | Nordeus



On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Kevin Grittner <[email protected]> wrote:


Johnny Tan <[email protected]> wrote:



> Wouldn't this be controlled by our checkpoint settings, though?



Spread checkpoints made the issue less severe, but on servers with

a lot of RAM I've had to make the above changes (or even go lower

with shared_buffers) to prevent a burst of writes from overwhelming

the RAID controllers battery-backed cache.  There may be other

things which could cause these symptoms, so I'm not certain that

this will help; but I have seen this as the cause and seen the

suggested changes help.



-Kevin





--

Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])

To make changes to your subscription:

http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


                                          

Reply via email to