On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > Niels Kristian Schjødt <nielskrist...@autouncle.com> wrote: > >> So my question is, should I also get something like pgpool2 setup >> at the same time? Is it, from your experience, likely to increase >> my throughput a lot more, if I had a connection pool of eg. 20 >> connections, instead of 300 concurrent ones directly? > > In my experience, it can make a big difference. If you are just > using the pooler for this reason, and don't need any of the other > features of pgpool, I suggest pgbouncer. It is a simpler, more > lightweight tool.
I second the pgbouncer rec. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
