On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 09:22:14AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> salah jubeh <s_ju...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > When I excute a query,� the exection time is about 1 minute; however, when
> > I execute the query with explain analyze the excution time jumps to 10
> > minutes.
>
> This isn't exactly unheard of, although it sounds like you have a
> particularly bad case. Cheap commodity PCs tend to have clock hardware
> that takes multiple microseconds to read ... which was fine thirty years
> ago when that hardware design was set, but with modern CPUs that's
> painfully slow.
>
> Short of getting a better machine, you might look into whether you can run
> a 64-bit instead of 32-bit operating system. In some cases that allows
> a clock reading to happen without a context switch to the kernel.
>
> > This is a little bit starnge for me; did any one experience somthing like
> > this? Can I trust the generated plans?
>
> The numbers are fine as far as they go, but you should realize that the
> relative cost of the cheaper plan nodes is being overstated, since the
> added instrumentation cost is the same per node call regardless of how
> much work happens within the node.
The original poster might also want to run pg_test_timing to get
hardware timing overhead:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/pgtesttiming.html
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
