2014-03-25, Matthew Spilich <mspil...@tripadvisor.com>:
> Has any on the forum seen something similar? Any suggestions on what > to look at next? If it is helpful to describe the server hardware, it's > got 2 E5-2670 cpu and 256 GB of ram, and the database is hosted on 1.6TB raid > 10 local storage (15K 300 GB drives). The workload is predominantly > read and the queries are mostly fairly simple selects from a single large > table generally specifying the primary key as part of the where clause > along with a few other filters. > I have seen something similar. It was because of large shared_buffers.
