Sorry that i just joined the list and have to break the thread to reply to
Tom Lane's response on this @
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13741.1396275...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Note that the indexscan is actually *slower* than the seqscan so far as
> the table access is concerned; if the table were big enough to not fit
> in RAM, this would get very much worse. So I'm not impressed with trying
> to force the optimizer's hand as you've done here --- it might be a nice
> plan now, but it's brittle. See if a bigger work_mem improves matters
> enough with the regular plan.
I agree to the point that hand tuning optimiser is brittle and something
that should not be done. But the reason to that was to force the index-only
scan (Not the index scan). I feel Index-only scan would speed up given
postgres is row oriented and we are running count-distinct on a column in a
table with lot of columns (Say 6-7 in number). I think that is what have
contributed to the gain in performance.
I did a similar test with around 2 million tuples with work_mem = 250 MB
and got the query to respond with 2x speed up. But the speed-up got with
index-only scan was huge and response was in sub-seconds whereas with
work_mem the response was couple of seconds.
> I doubt you need the "where email=email" hack, in any case. That isn't
> forcing the optimizer's decision in any meaningful fashion.
This is the where clause which forced the index-only scan on partial index.
AFAIK, whenever the the tuples estimated to be processed by query is going
to be high, Postgres does a seq scan. This was happening even in the
following query even though an index was present in the email column and
index-only could have had much faster processing. I think the planner is
taking a hit on estimating the cost of the query with index-only scan. So
the little trick we had put in was to create a partial index on email field
of the participants table and use the same condition of the partial index
in the query to trick the optimiser to use index-only scans.
Query : select count(distinct email) from participants;
Please revert me back if i'm missing something.
--
Thanks,
M. Varadharajan
------------------------------------------------
"Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted"
-By Prof. Randy Pausch in "The Last Lecture"
My Journal :- www.thinkasgeek.wordpress.com
