På torsdag 01. mai 2014 kl. 20:35:07, skrev Jochem Berndsen <joc...@functor.nl 
<mailto:joc...@functor.nl>>: 
 Hi Andreas,

 [New to this list, forgive my ignorance.]
 [snip]
 I'm getting better performance with:

 SELECT
 m.id AS message_id,
 1 AS person_id,
 FALSE AS is_read,
 m.subject
 FROM message m
 WHERE 1 = 1
 AND NOT EXISTS(SELECT
      *
      FROM message_property pr
      WHERE pr.message_id = m.id AND pr.person_id = 1 AND pr.is_read);

 You then lose the distinction between message_property with is_read =
 FALSE, and nonexistent message_property for the message row.

 If that is essential, I'm getting a roughly 2x speedup on my non-tuned
 PostgreSQL with:
   SELECT
      m.id                          AS message_id,
      prop.person_id,
      coalesce(prop.is_read, FALSE) AS is_read,
      m.subject
 FROM message m
      LEFT OUTER JOIN message_property prop ON prop.message_id = m.id AND
 prop.person_id = 1
 WHERE not coalesce(prop.is_read, false);     Hi Jochem,   Thansk for looking 
at it. I'm still seing ~500ms being spent and I was hoping for a way to do this 
using index so one could achieve 1-10ms, but maybe that's impossible given the 
schema?   Is there a way to design an equivalent  schema to achieve <10ms 
execution-time?   -- Andreas Jospeh Krogh CTO / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 
909 56 963 andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com> www.visena.com 
<https://www.visena.com>  <https://www.visena.com>  

Reply via email to