On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Jeff Frost <[email protected]> wrote: >> So it seems like we have a candidate explanation. I'm a bit surprised >> that StandbyReleaseLocks would get this slow if there are only a dozen >> AccessExclusiveLocks in place at any one time, though. Perhaps that >> was a low point and there are often many more? >> >> > > Entirely possible that it was a low point. We'll set up some monitoring to > track the number of AccessExclusiveLocks and see how much variance there is > throughout the day.
Since we turned on the monitoring for that, we had a peak of 13,550 AccessExclusiveLocks. So far most of the samples have been in the double digit, with that and two other outliers: 6,118 and 12,747.
