Marco Di Cesare <marco.dices...@pointclickcare.com> writes:
>                 COUNT(DISTINCT "foxtrot_india"."bravo_romeo")  

Ah.  That explains why the planner doesn't want to use a hash aggregation
step --- DISTINCT aggregates aren't supported with those.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to