On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Volker Böhm <vol...@vboehm.de> wrote:
> > > CREATE INDEX trgm_adresse ON adressen.adresse USING gist > (normalize_string((btrim((((((((normalize_string((((COALESCE((vorname)::text, > ''::text) || ' '::text) || (name1)::text))::character varying, > (-1)))::text || ' '::text) || (normalize_string((COALESCE((strasse)::text, > ''::text))::character varying, (-2)))::text) || ' '::text) || (plz)::text) > || ' '::text) || (normalize_string((COALESCE((ort)::text, > ''::text))::character varying, (-3)))::text)))::character varying) > gist_trgm_ops); > You might have better luck with gin_trgm_ops than gist_trgm_ops. Have you tried that? ... > When such a slow query is running, 'top' shows nearly '100 % wait' and > 'iotop' shows 3 - 8 MB/sec disk read by a process > postgres: vb vb 10.128.96.25(60435) FETCH > > Also the postgres log, which was told to log every task longer than 5000 > ms, shows > > 2015-09-02 13:44:48 CEST [25237-1] vb@vb LOG: duration: 55817.191 > ms execute <unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0xa2d61f6c" > > Since I never used a FETCH command in my life, this must be used by > pg_trgm or something inside it (gin, gist etc.) > The FETCH is probably being automatically added by whatever python library you are use to talk to PostgreSQL. Are you using a named cursor in python? In any event, that is not the cause of the problem. Can you get the result of the indexed expression for a query that is slow?