2016-10-11 13:19 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Zawadzki <zawa...@gmail.com>:
> On 11.10.2016 03:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
>
> 2016-10-10 23:17 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Zawadzki <zawa...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 10.10.2016 17:31, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Today, I noticed strange situation:
>>
>> The same query run on different servers has very different plan:
>>
>> Q: SELECT b.* FROM kredytob b WHERE pesel = '22222222222' ORDER BY b.id
>> DESC LIMIT 1
>>
>> Slow plan:
>>
>> "Limit (cost=0.43..28712.33 rows=1 width=4) (actual
>> time=2574.041..2574.044 rows=1 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=316132 read=110001"
>> " -> Index Scan Backward using kredytob_pkey on public.kredytob b
>> (cost=0.43..3244444.80 rows=113 width=4) (actual time=2574.034..2574.034
>> rows=1 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Filter: (b.pesel = '22222222222'::bpchar)"
>> " Rows Removed by Filter: 433609"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=316132 read=110001"
>> "Planning time: 0.414 ms"
>> "Execution time: 2574.139 ms"
>>
>>
>> Fast plan:
>> "Limit (cost=115240.66..115240.66 rows=1 width=4) (actual
>> time=463.275..463.276 rows=1 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=14661 read=4576"
>> " -> Sort (cost=115240.66..115240.94 rows=112 width=4) (actual
>> time=463.271..463.271 rows=1 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Sort Key: b.id DESC"
>> " Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 25kB"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=14661 read=4576"
>> " -> Index Scan using kredytob_pesel_typkred_opclass_idx on
>> public.kredytob b (cost=0.43..115240.10 rows=112 width=4) (actual
>> time=311.347..463.183 rows=5 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Index Cond: (b.pesel = '22222222222'::bpchar)"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=14661 read=4576"
>> "Planning time: 0.383 ms"
>> "Execution time: 463.324 ms"
>>
>> Data is almost equal - "slow" has a few more rows in table. ("Fast" is a
>> copy from 1 am today).
>> Why runtime is slower?
>>
>>
>> I made another INDEX, without opclass:
>>
>> CREATE INDEX kredytob_pesel_typkred_idx
>> ON public.kredytob
>> USING btree
>> (pesel COLLATE pg_catalog."default", typkred);
>>
>> after that: analyze kredytob;
>>
>> And now:
>> "Limit (cost=333.31..333.31 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.100..0.102
>> rows=1 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=8"
>> " -> Sort (cost=333.31..333.59 rows=114 width=4) (actual
>> time=0.095..0.095 rows=1 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Sort Key: b.id DESC"
>> " Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 25kB"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=8"
>> " -> Index Scan using kredytob_pesel_typkred_idx on
>> public.kredytob b (cost=0.43..332.74 rows=114 width=4) (actual
>> time=0.046..0.065 rows=5 loops=1)"
>> " Output: id"
>> " Index Cond: (b.pesel = '22222222222'::bpchar)"
>> " Buffers: shared hit=8"
>> "Planning time: 0.438 ms"
>> "Execution time: 0.154 ms"
>>
>> So, what is a reason that "SLOW" server doesn't like opclass index?
>>
>
> what is default locales?
>
> LATIN2 - that's why I use opclass.
>
Is it this local in both cases?
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Andrzej
>
