On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm > (greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but poor in > production following a 9.6 in place upgrade from 9.2. By poor I mean > 7x slower. Problem was resolved by ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE followed by > a REINDEX on the impacted table. Hope this helps somebody at some > point :-). > It was probably the implementation of the triconsistent function for pg_trgm (or I would like to think so, anyway). But if so, the REINDEX should not have been necessary, just the ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE should do the trick. Rebuiding a large gin index can be pretty slow. Cheers, Jeff
