On 04/27/2017 09:34 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-04-27 09:31:34 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 04/27/2017 08:59 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
I would agree it isn't yet a widespread issue.
I'm not yet sure about that actually. I suspect a large percentage of
people with such workloads aren't lingering lots on the lists.
That would probably be true. I was thinking of it more as the "most new
users are in the cloud" and the "cloud" is going to be rare that a cloud
user is going to be able to hit that level of writes. (at least not
without spending LOTS of money)
The only people that are likely going to see this are going to be on bare
metal. We should definitely plan on that issue for say 11.
"plan on that issue" - heh. We're talking about major engineering
projects here ;)
Sorry, wasn't trying to make light of the effort. :D
I do have a question though, where you have seen this issue is it with
synchronous_commit on or off?
Both. Whether that matters or not really depends on the workload. If you
have bulk writes, it doesn't really matter much.
Sure, o.k.
Thanks,
Andres
- Andres
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
