On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Charles Nadeau <charles.nad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rick, > > Should the number of page should always be correlated to the VmPeak of the > postmaster or could it be set to reflect shared_buffer or another setting? > Thanks! > > The documentation implies that you may need to adjust its size when you change shared_buffer settings. I usually check it every now and then (I haven't build a formal monitor yet.) to see if all of the huge pages are free/used and if it looks like they are all getting consumed - consider bumping it higher. If there are lots free, you are probably fine. cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i "^huge" -- Also regarding my note on effective_io_concurrency, which I'm not sure you tried tweaking yet. With file system and hardware caching between you and your spindles, your best setting for effective_io_concurrency may be much higher than the actual number of spindles. It is worth experimenting with. If you can, try several values. You can use pg_bench to put consistent workloads on your database for measurement purposes. Charles > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Rick Otten <rottenwindf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Although probably not the root cause, at the least I would set up >> hugepages ( https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/kernel-resourc >> es.html#LINUX-HUGE-PAGES ), and bump effective_io_concurrency up quite a >> bit as well (256 ?). >> >>
