Hi Pavel, *, you were right with ANALYZing the DB first. However, even after doing so, I frequently see Seq Scans where an index was used before. This usually cooccurs with parallelization and looked different before upgrading to 10. I can provide an example for 10 [1], but I cannot generate a query plan for 9.6 anymore.
Any ideas what makes the new version more seqscanny? [1] https://explain.depesz.com/s/gXD3 -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
