Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness

[Tom Lane]

Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gid is unique.. it's a serial..

Mph.  If you assume that gid is unique then the query would give
well-defined results, but if you know it's unique then why don't
you just leave off the DISTINCT?

> funny thing is tho this worked on 6.5

No, 6.5 merely failed to notice that it was giving you undefined
results.

                        regards, tom lane