[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Bruce, Tom, etc.: > > > > This is what I mean. Does the DB engine only recycle > > > *unused* OIDs (that is, does it check for teh continued > > > existance of a tuple with OID 198401)? If that's the > > > method, then there isn't really a problem even if I do > > use > > > OIDs as a primary index. None of my OIDs still in use > > will > > > be touched. > > > > > > No, it uses all oids, and can create duplicates. > > Does this mean that Tom's "Wraparound Ragnarok" is the > accurate scenario? Yes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational d... Josh Berkus
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relation... Bruce Momjian
- [SQL] Re: OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Jeff MacDonald
- RE: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Michael Ansley
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Mitch Vincent
- RE: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Michael Ansley
- RE: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Michael Ansley
- RE: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Michael Ansley
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Josh Berkus
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Josh Berkus
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Bruce Momjian
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases Josh Berkus
- Re: [SQL] OID Perfomance - Object-Relational datab... Bruce Momjian