Re: [SQL] shared memory problem

[Tom Lane]

Michael Teter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps there's some issue with the shared memory not
> being freed quickly enough by the kernel?

Never heard of that before.  There is an issue with time delays
on release of port addresses ---  sometimes you may get a failure
to bind() to a port address that was just released by a previous
incarnation of the postmaster.  But I haven't heard of such a
thing for shared memory or semaphores.

                        regards, tom lane