Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
>
> >However, I also use Postgres (7.0.2) throughout this
> >application and it seems cleaner to me to keep the current
> >id value in a table and just use postgres to provide access
> >(with a trigger function to increment the id on access).
>
> Why not a sequence?
Can someone show me how to create (and use) an int8 sequence?
> >Is this reasonable? Is it fast? (I need 10 or more IDs
> >generated each second.) Can I avoid having the table
> >gradually fill with "old" rows for this entry, and this
> >avoid the need to run VACUUM ANALYZE periodically?
>
> The only problem I have had with this type of thing is when a number gets
> deleted, it does not get recycled.
Fortunately, I don't want any number to ever get recycled - the id needs to
be unique throughout the 25+ year lifetime of the project. The table
would have a single row with a single column. Selecting that table cell
would return the current value, but leave the value incremented in the
table cell (it's ok if it increments the value before returning).
--
Steve Wampler- SOLIS Project, National Solar Observatory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
