> Reiner Dassing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The primary index must be the epoch.
> > As there will be no deletion from this data I fear - due to the
> > internal representation of B-trees - the performance will degrade very
> > soon.
>
> Nonsense. btree should work just fine for that. Use a timestamp
> column for the primary key, and away you go.
>
> (Actually, time alone doesn't seem like it'd be necessarily unique,
> so maybe you don't want to call it a primary key. But certainly
> you can make a non-unique index on that column.)
I assume the user is concerned about non-balanced btrees. Ours are
auto-balancing.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
