On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> None, I fear. The stuff you are fooling with is leftover from the old
> PostQuel language. Most of it is suffering from bit rot, because the
> developers' focus has been on SQL92 compliance for the last six or seven
> years. I hadn't realized that SQL99 had caught up to PostQuel in this
> area ;-). Sounds like we will have to dust off some of that stuff and
> get it working again. No promises about timeframe, unless someone
> steps up to the plate to do the work...
What goes around comes around. :-)
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
mixed emotions:
Watching a bus-load of lawyers plunge off a cliff.
With five empty seats.
