Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good point.  How long is the next cycle likely to take?

Good question.  I'd like to say 4 to 6 months, but that was how long 7.1
was supposed to take, and we're pushing a year now.

What might make the most sense is to develop and test a fix in the early
part of the 7.2 development cycle, and then back-patch it into a 7.1.x
release perhaps 2 or 3 months from now.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to