Em 05 Apr 2001, Cedar Cox escreveu:
>To this I say, remember that you are using a database! I would split this
>into 3 tables (people, exams, answers). Then only the 'answers' table
>would contain 3M records. Should be a bit faster. You don't want to have
>to store the <person> and <exam> with each <answer>.
>
>(If this is what you are doing then ignore me. I don't take you for an
>idiot :)
Yeah... I'm doing this... (I'm not a idiot! :)))) I'm just asking if
exist any way to optimize PostgreSQL to handle a great quantity of tuples.
(I will try the 7.1. By the way... in the URI
http://www.postgresql.org/ftpsite/dev/ we found a RC2 version, but in the
URI ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/dev/ don't!)
Hugs,
Edipo Elder
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
_________________________________________________________
Oi! Você quer um iG-mail gratuito?
Então clique aqui: http://www.ig.com.br/paginas/assineigmail.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
