Ries van Twisk wrote: > I have a small question which I could not clearly find in the postgreSQL > manual. > > if I create this table and index > CRAEATE TABLE test ( > id SERIAL, > c1 VARCHAR(32), > c2 VARCHAR(32), > c3 VARCHAR(32) > ); > > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX test_idx ON test(id, c1,c2); > > what I try to archive here is that I don't want duplicate pais in my table: > example > > INSET INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('a', 'a'); -- Allowed > INSET INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('b', 'b'); -- Allowed > INSET INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('b', 'c'); -- Allowed > INSET INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('a', 'a'); -- Not allowed since we already > have a duplicate ('a', 'a') pair > INSET INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('b', 'c'); -- Not allowed since we already > have a duplicate ('b', 'c') pair > > etc. etc. I think you get the idea...
I have the same issue with a table that currently holds well over 600,000 rows. The case you left out is this: INSERT INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('a','c'); INSERT INTO test (c1,c2) VALUES('c','a'); I want that to fail, but I haven't been able to get it to fail using unique indexes. I presume ordering is significant. Instead, I am doing a SELECT prior to insert to insure the pair doesn't already exist. If you've been able to get order-independent pairs restricted to being unique using indexes, I'd like to know about it. :-) Kevin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster