Tom, > > I'm kind of surprised that it's possible to index a temporary > table. > > There's not much point in doing so. > > Why not? You seem to be equating "temporary" with "small", but I > don't > see why that must be so.
Nah. I'm equating "temporary" with "query twice and throw away", which isn't necessarily what everyone else does. BTW, Ludwig, in postgresql versions < 7.2.0, I noticed that sometimes indexes didn't seem to completely go away (i.e. I would get a name conflict if I tried to drop & re-create in the same transaction) without a VACUUM. If you're using 7.1.3, you should upgrade for this reason. -Josh Berkus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]