Actually, the ORDER BY  *must* be replaced by GROUP BY since it is an
aggregate query.

I have implemented it, and the results are startling, I get the same value
repeated for all projects
i.e.:
AS1   AS1-AJAX/SALEM SIDE   3   0   6   7   30   0   216   240
AU3   AU3-RIVERIDGE/AURORA   3   0   6   7   30   0   216   240
AV1   AVALON   3   0   6   7   30   0   216   240
AW1   AW1-AJAX/WESTNEY SIDE   3   0   6   7   30   0   216   240
AWM   AW MORTGAGE   3   0   6   7   30   0   216   240
AX1   AX1-ROSE PETAL VALLEY DEV INC   3   0   6   7   30   0   216   240

And this appears to be the correct data row for a row that is the first
(alphabetically) project that has non zero data in it.


This is the final query, can anyone see anything wrong with it?:
SELECT  projects.project_id, projects.marketing_name,
        COUNT(lots.lot_id) AS def_count,
        COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-10-08'}
                                THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END
        ) AS def_count_less_30,
                COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-10-08'}
                                        AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-09-08'}
                                THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END
                ) AS def_count_30_60,
        COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-09-08'}
                        THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END
        ) AS def_count_greater_60,
        COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-10-08'}
                                                        AND dt.deficiency_status_id = 
ds.deficiency_status_id
                                                THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END)
        ) AS lot_count_less_30,
                COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-10-08'}
                                                                AND 
dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-09-08'}
                                                        THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END)
                ) AS lot_count_30_60,
        COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-09-08'}
                                                THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END)
        ) AS lot_count_greater_60,
        COUNT(DISTINCT lots.lot_id) AS lot_count
FROM
        (SELECT * FROM deficiency_table) AS dt,
        (SELECT * FROM deficiency_status WHERE is_outstanding) AS ds,
        (SELECT * FROM projects WHERE division_id = 'GGH') AS proj,
        (SELECT * FROM lots) AS lots
WHERE   proj.division_id = 'GGH'
    AND lots.division_id = proj.division_id
    AND lots.project_id = proj.project_id
        AND dt.lot_id = lots.lot_id
        AND dt.deficiency_status_id = ds.deficiency_status_id
        AND ds.is_outstanding
        AND lots.project_id = 'EM16'
        AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM menu_group_projects WHERE menu_code = 'WA'
AND division_id = proj.division_id AND project_id = proj.project_id AND
status = 'I')
GROUP BY projects.project_id, projects.marketing_name

Terry Fielder
Network Engineer
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christoph Haller
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SQL] query optimization question
>
>
> >  SELECT
> >      project_id,
> >      marketing_name,
> >      COUNT(lots.lot_id) AS def_count,
> >      COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-10-07'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END) AS
> def_count_less_30,
> >      COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-10-07'}
> >                      AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-09-07'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END) AS
> def_count_30_60,
> >      COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-09-07'}
> >                      AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-08-08'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END) AS
> def_count_60_90,
> >      COUNT(CASE WHEN dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-08-08'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END) AS
> def_count_greater_90,
> >      COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN
> >                      dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-10-07'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END )) AS
> lot_count_less_30,
> >     COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN
> >                      dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-10-07'}
> >                      AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-09-07'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END )) AS
> lot_count_30_60,
> >     COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN
> >                      dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-09-07'}
> >                      AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-08-08'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END )) AS
> lot_count_60_90,
> >     COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN
> >                      dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-08-08'}
> >                      THEN lots.lot_id ELSE NULL END )) AS
> lot_count_greater_90,
> >     COUNT(DISTINCT lots.lot_id) AS lot_count
> >  FROM
> >     (SELECT * FROM deficiency_table
> >                 WHERE assigned_supplier_id = '101690') AS dt,
> >     (SELECT * FROM deficiency_status
> >                 WHERE is_outstanding) AS ds,
> >     (SELECT * FROM projects
> >                 WHERE division_id = 'GGH') AS proj,
> >     lots
> >  WHERE
> >     dt.lot_id = lots.lot_id
> >     AND lots.division_id = proj.division_id
> >     AND lots.project_id = proj.project_id
> >     AND dt.deficiency_status_id = ds.deficiency_status_id
> >     AND NOT EXISTS
> >            (SELECT 1 FROM menu_group_projects
> >               WHERE menu_code = 'WA'
> >                   AND division_id = proj.division_id
> >                   AND project_id = proj.project_id
> >                   AND status = 'I')
> >  ORDER BY proj.project_id ;
>
> What about simply replacing ORDER BY proj.project_id ; by
>  GROUP BY project_id, marketing_name ;
>
> Regards, Christoph
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to