I have vacuum analyzed recently. I do it after a large number of inserts
and after indexing. This database is in the development stages so there is
a lot of data loading at this time. We are also using 7.2.3. Here is
the explain analyze:

Group (cost=637.18..696.52 rows=593 width=22) (actual time=982.67..67581.85 row
s=435 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=637.18..637.18 rows=5934 width=22) (actual time=833.27..844.78
rows=6571 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key, msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key,
msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key, msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key, msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key on
tbl_bls_msa b (cost=0.00..265.30 rows=5934 width=22) (actual time=0.80..367.64
rows=6571 loops=1)
SubPlan
-> Index Scan using msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key on tbl_bls_msa bls (cost=0.00
..53.80 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=16.46..30.36 rows=1 loops=435)
-> Index Scan using msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key on tbl_bls_msa bls (cost=0.00
..53.80 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=16.54..30.41 rows=1 loops=435)
-> Index Scan using msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key on tbl_bls_msa bls (cost=0.00
..53.80 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=16.53..30.69 rows=1 loops=435)
-> Index Scan using msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key on tbl_bls_msa bls (cost=0.00
..53.80 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=16.19..30.66 rows=1 loops=435)
-> Index Scan using msa_code_tbl_bls_msa_key on tbl_bls_msa bls (cost=0.00
..53.80 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=16.19..30.80 rows=1 loops=435)
Total runtime: 67589.69 msec

EXPLAIN

Thanks for the help.

At 10:21 AM 11/19/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Ellen Cyran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to make this query faster?  I have indexes on year,
> msa_code, and sic.  I've also tried it with
> an index on the combined group by columns.  I've made both sort_mem and
> shared_buffers bigger, but still this query
> takes 40 seconds when I select 4 msa_codes and 7 minutes when I select 40
> msa_codes.

Hm, have you vacuum analyzed lately?  Those cost estimates seem awfully
low for a query that is taking 40 sec.  Also, if you're using 7.2 (which
you should be ;-)) then showing EXPLAIN ANALYZE results would be more
useful than plain EXPLAIN.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to