> thing that causes me some minor grief is the fact that currently you > cannot have default values to function parameters, a feature we use a > lot.
The default value is used when the parameter is NULL or unprovided? fn(integer, integer, integer default 32) select fn(integer, integer); <- Third argument would be '32'? When PostgreSQL gets named parameters the above probably makes sense to add. A TODO item? -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
