On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Rod Taylor wrote: > > Thanks, Stephan. I was really hoping that the IN(valuelist) was going to > > be changed at the same time, because it really is unusable for anything > > over a couple of thousand values. > > Changed to do what?
One possibility might be to act as if the valuelist was a table and do the IN as if it were that way, rather than treating it as a set of ORs. That would be basically like doing the temporary table solution, but without requiring the user to do it. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
