Ð ÐÐÐ, 22.12.2003, Ð 18:53, scott.marlowe ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
>
> > As I am not someone with a lot of experience....
> > (depending on the size of the 'dumpall') I would
> > create a new database to suck up the 'all' then
> > pg_dump the table I really cared about.
> >
> > Obviously, if the dump_all is a terabyte database this
> > method is inconvenient.... (to say the least).
> >
> > However it will work.
>
> In the past I've used
>
> 'cat -n filename'|grep -4 database
>
> to find the starting points of individual databases etc... and then used
> split to break it into the exact right size pieces to do this.
That sounds like something pg_dump / pg_dumpall should be able to do
itself, don't you think?
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
