On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Dario V. Fassi wrote: > Stephan, look at the samples I send in previous posts , from PgSql and Db2.
I don't see any samples apart from the original view descriptions and the getColumns results. I see some implication about db2 but no details. My guess is that the messages are more recent than the last archives update and since I'm not on -jdbc I wouldn't have seen them. That's pretty much why I asked. > I know it's a no ease task to change all that behavior , but you must > agree that a Numeric column with the fractional part varing from row to > row are different data types and break relational rules. Maybe, but without seeing the example, it's hard to say. For example, your views from the head of what I see for this on archives, consistently give me output with a scale of 3. In addition, PostgreSQL provides a numeric with effectively undefined precision and scale. This is a non-conforming definition, but means that while the number of digits after the decimal are different, it's the same type, numeric with undefined precision and scale. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
