I wrote: > There's nothing particularly stopping us from supporting > multiple-argument aggregates, except a lack of round tuits.
BTW, you can actually fake this pretty well in 8.0, by making an aggregate that uses a rowtype input. For example: regression=# create type twostrings as (s1 text, s2 text); CREATE TYPE regression=# create function list_concat(text, twostrings) returns text as $$ regression$# select case when $1 is null then $2.s1 regression$# when $2.s1 is null then $1 regression$# else $1 || $2.s2 || $2.s1 regression$# end$$ language sql; CREATE FUNCTION regression=# create aggregate concat ( regression(# basetype = twostrings, regression(# stype = text, regression(# sfunc = list_concat); CREATE AGGREGATE regression=# select * from text_tbl; f1 ------------------- doh! hi de ho neighbor more stuff and more (4 rows) regression=# select concat((f1, '|')) from text_tbl; concat -------------------------------------------- doh!|hi de ho neighbor|more stuff|and more (1 row) This is somewhat inefficient compared to native support for multi-argument aggregates, but at least we have something we can point people to until we find time to make that happen. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org