Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:33:08 +0530,
  Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to the OP and not to the list. reply-all button results in needless duplication

The duplication is needless. Direct replies very often get to the recipient
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                 is *not* needless?

faster than ones sent through the lists. It is also possible that the direct
replies might be handled differently by the recipient (e.g. a filter may put
them in different folders).

This is very true. In fact, I get mildly annoyed when people *don't* include the direct reply to me, because I very actively filter/redirect my mail. Replies directly to me are pretty much guaranteed to be seen quickly, but the ones that go to the list might get lost among the hundreds of posts that go into my "postgres" inbox every day. I think many other people do something similar.


Recipients that prefer not to get separate copies can indicate that desire
by including an appropiate mail-followup-to header.

Also true.

Joe

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to