On 8/18/2004 2:55 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Jan,

If a.x is unique, then (b.x, b.y) references (a.x, a.y) is only ensuring that the redundant copy of y in b.y stays in sync with a.y.

So? What's denormalized about that? His other choice is to use a trigger.

Because the value in b.y is redundant. b.x->a.x->a.y is exactly the same value and he even wants to ensure this with the constraint.



Jan


What he's trying to do is ensure that the class selected for the FK class_name, field_name relates to the same class_name in objects.




--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to