Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the original code thought CIDR and INET where identical types
> that could be cast with no changes but we are finding that was incorrect.
That's what it seems to boil down to. We need to rethink the separation
between those datatypes. At the very least, the casts between them
cannot both be code-less binary-compatibility casts.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
