Alvaro Nunes Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed what i think is a weird behaviour with SRFs. When I use them > in a SELECT clause, and the SRF returns no rows, the query returns no > rows too, when I think it should return an a null column.
Why would you think that? The behavior is exactly right as-is.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
